In the May-June issue of Harvard Magazine, there appears an article titled “The Risks of Homeschooling.” The author, Erin O’ Donnell, reports on a paper by Harvard professor Elizabeth Bartholet that recommends that homeschooling should be banned. The rational is that “homeschooling . . . not only violates children’s right to a ‘meaningful education’ and their right to be protected from potential child abuse, but may keep them from contributing positively to a democratic society.”
Bartholet appears to have four primary arguments:
Since homeschooling is generally unregulated in the U.S. (and largely regulations are unenforced where there are any), “people can homeschool who’ve never gone to school themselves, who don’t read or write themselves.”
Since homeschool children are isolated, then teachers cannot observe and report when there is abuse at home.
A majority of homeschool families “(by some estimates, up to 90 percent) are driven by conservative Christian beliefs, and seek to remove their children from mainstream culture. Bartholet notes that some of these parents are ‘extreme religious ideologues’ who question science and promote female subservience and white supremacy.”
“She views the absence of regulations ensuring that homeschooled children receive a meaningful education equivalent to that required in public schools as a threat to U.S. democracy.”
Almost immediately, a flurry of articles were written in response that criticized Bartholet’s ideas.
Harvard Law Professor Attacks Homeschoolers, as She Envisions Them by Michael Farris
Harvard Law School Calls for Ban on Homeschooling; Homeschooled Harvard Graduate On Why This is Wrong by Melba Pearson
Harvard Professor Makes The Case For Homeschool Ban. Here’s Everything Wrong With Her Argument by Matt Walsh
Homeschooling in the Crosshairs—Harvard Magazine Says Homeschooling Families Are a Threat to Democracy by Albert Mohler
Harvard Law Prof Wants to Ban Homeschooling by John Stonestreet and Shane Morris.
You will find in these some excellent responses to the flawed reasoning and lack of evidence that supports this argument. The research that contradicts Bartholet’s understanding of the success and safety of home education have already been amply provided. I would like to focus on what I believe to be the most important, underlying worldview principle behind this line of thinking.
The Heart of the Issue
I was not surprised that this article was written. In fact, I have been surprised and grateful for how much freedom parents have enjoyed in the US, and in particular in North Carolina, to homeschool their children. I have been expecting a much more overt, ideological argument against homeschooling like this one to emerge. It reflects the seemingly ever increasing worldview chasm in our culture. One aspect of that worldview difference is not even about home education, it is about parental rights and the role of government.
That parental rights and the role of government are at the heart of the issue is revealed in statements like these from the Harvard Magazine article:
“From the beginning of compulsory education in this country, we have thought of the government as having some right to educate children so that they become active, productive participants in the larger society.”
“A central tenet of this lobby [HSLDA] is that parents have absolute rights that prevent the state from intervening to try to safeguard the child’s right to education and protection.
“The issue is, do we think that parents should have 24/7, essentially authoritarian control over their children from ages zero to 18? I think that’s dangerous.”
Bartholet’s view is that the government has a right to educate children, that HSLDA doesn’t want the government to help protect children, and that parents who homeschool have dangerous authoritarian control over their children. A brief response: You will find no such governmental right in the constitution; HSLDA would never stand in the way of the government truly protecting children; and this caricature of homeschool parenting is an irresponsible, unsubstantiated generalization.
North Carolinians for Home Education holds that parents have a right and responsibility to raise their children according to their own convictions and choose whatever form of education they believe to be best for their children. Parents do not have the right to abuse their children, and the government has a responsibility to protect abused children.
We help parents homeschool with confidence and joy by protecting their rights to homeschool in North Carolina. There is currently no legislation being considered that would restrict that right. The battle we must be aware of and fight today is ideological, knowing that the attack against home education will make its way to the legislature. Bartholet makes this intent clear as she “recommends a presumptive ban on the practice” of home education.
[Originally published on the NCHE Blog]
